Public Reactions to Instances of Workplace Gender Discrimination

Author(s)
Benedikt Schnurr, Christoph Fuchs
Abstract

The number of people witnessing or experiencing gender discrimination at work is still high around the globe. While the existing literature has investigated potential mechanisms underlying gender discrimination and the consequences of experiencing gender discrimination at work, it remains unclear how third-party observers—as opposed to employees or coworkers—react to specific instances of workplace gender discrimination. The results of six experiments demonstrate that (a) people in general judge organizational decisions that discriminate against individual male (vs. female) workers as more legitimate and (b) this difference in legitimacy judgments is significantly greater among women than men. This discrepancy in legitimacy judgments occurs because women (more than men) consider the collective situation of female and male workers when judging the legitimacy of organizational decisions that discriminate against individual workers based on gender. These findings document how group-level concerns shape people’s legitimacy judgments of organizational decisions discriminating against individuals and equip organizations and policymakers with a better understanding of people’s polarized opinions regarding gender discrimination at the workplace.

Organisation(s)
Department of Marketing and International Business
External organisation(s)
Technische Universität München
Journal
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume
29
Pages
451-466
No. of pages
16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000433
Publication date
2022
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
501006 Experimental psychology, 502019 Marketing
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 5 - Gender Equality
Portal url
https://ucrisportal.univie.ac.at/en/publications/public-reactions-to-instances-of-workplace-gender-discrimination(deb08516-40ad-4ee5-8d50-e013d4a584af).html